Case 1809157/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jan Eliasz v MKM Building Supplies (Castleford) Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1809157/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rakhim Sitting
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jan Eliasz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Jan Eliasz, brought a claim against MKM Building Supplies (Castleford) Limited for unauthorised deductions in respect of payment in lieu of notice. The case was heard remotely at Leeds Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Rakhim on 25 April 2024, with the claimant attending virtually and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was well founded and succeeded by consent between the parties. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,230.76 gross, and stated that the respondent was responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the claim as an unauthorised deductions claim for payment in lieu of notice and records that it succeeded by consent between the parties. | Upheld | — | £3,231 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,231
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.