Case 1809299/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Jedrzejewska v Trendz Catering Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1809299/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jaleel Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Jedrzejewska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds by CVP on 8 August 2025, Employment Judge Jaleel heard Ms G Jedrzejewska's claims against Trendz Catering Limited. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. It ordered payment of £756 gross for the unpaid wages claim and £876 gross for the annual leave payment, making a total award of £1,632 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent failed to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due. | Upheld | — | £756 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of payment in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,632
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.