Case 1809848/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Palmer v Supergreen UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1809848/2018
- Decision date
- 8 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Davies Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not file an ET3 response form. On the material before her, Employment Judge S Davies considered that there was sufficient evidence to make a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim and unlawful deductions from wages claim. The judgment records that this was a liability-only decision, so no monetary award was assessed at that stage.
The matter was listed to proceed to a separate remedy hearing before an Employment Judge sitting alone, with a time estimate of one hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Liability only; no remedy was decided in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Liability only; no remedy was decided in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.