Case 1809937/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Penman (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 1809937/2018
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Penman (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds before Employment Judge Davies on 4 to 7 February 2020, dismissed both of the claimant's dismissal complaints. The written judgment records that the claimant's complaints of automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure and ordinary unfair dismissal were not well-founded.
No separate remedy was awarded because both claims failed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The extracted text does not include the tribunal's detailed factual findings or reasoning beyond the final outcome.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a complaint of automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as ordinary unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.