Case 1810333/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Samantha Clarke v Holiday Homes at Heart Ltd HELD AT: Leeds Employment Tribunal ( By CVP) — 2026
- Case reference
- 1810333/2024
- Decision date
- 5 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Samantha Clarke
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buckley, sitting alone at Leeds Employment Tribunal by CVP on 5 March 2026, determined the claim under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the respondent failed to present a valid response in time and did not appear at the hearing. The claimant was represented by Ms Ambler as litigation friend.
The tribunal found that the claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £892.30. The judgment recorded that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further legal analysis or findings of fact are set out in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay succeeded. Determined under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and did not appear. | Upheld | — | £892 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £892
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.