George Evans v AB Agri Ltd — 2026

Case reference: 1810458/2024
Decision date: 8 January 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Singh Representation
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

George Evans

Respondent

AB Agri Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal against AB Agri Ltd. The case was heard at Leeds Employment Tribunal via CVP before Employment Judge Singh.

The tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written judgment states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states only that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given, but no written reasons are included in the provided text.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.