Case 1810462/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the Third Claimant: In person For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 1810462/2024
- Decision date
- 10 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Morgan Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the Second Claimant: In person For the Third Claimant: In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public on 8-9 September 2025, Employment Judge P Morgan determined disability status for the Second and Third Claimants under section 6 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found that the Second Claimant was a disabled person because of arthritis in the knee, but not because of hypertension, arthritis affecting the shoulders, elbow and wrists, stress, anxiety or depression. On that basis, her complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments could proceed.
The tribunal also found that the Third Claimant was a disabled person because of arthritis and/or diabetes, but not because of depression and/or low mood. Her complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments could also proceed. The judgment records that all claims in the case are to proceed to final hearing in accordance with the Case Management Order. No remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the Second Claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of arthritis in the knee, and that her complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments could proceed. It found she was not disabled for the other conditions pleaded. | Other | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the Third Claimant was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 because of arthritis and/or diabetes, and that her complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments could proceed. It found she was not disabled for depression and/or low mood. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.