Case 1810534/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Frew, counsel v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1810534/2018
- Decision date
- 26 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Ms B R Hodgkinson, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Frew, counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Leeds on 18 to 22 and 25 to 26 March 2019 before Employment Judge Cox with lay members Ms B R Hodgkinson and Mr K Lannaman. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
The judgment records that the claimant withdrew the unauthorised deduction from wages claim, the maternity discrimination claim based on deduction from wages, the unpaid holiday pay claim, and all maternity discrimination claims other than discrimination by demotion. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The remaining claims of maternity discrimination by demotion, victimisation, unfair dismissal by reason of maternity, and wrongful dismissal were all dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described in the judgment as unauthorised deduction from wages; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim described in the judgment as maternity discrimination by deduction from wages; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay; dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Judgment recorded that all maternity discrimination claims other than discrimination by demotion were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim of maternity discrimination by demotion failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim failed and was dismissed. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.