Case 1810867/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr L Morton-Buwerimwe v Plusnet plc — 2019

Case reference: 1810867/2018
Decision date: 27 February 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge JM Wade

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr L Morton-Buwerimwe

Respondent

Plusnet plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment records that the claimant had been given an opportunity, by letter dated 1 February 2019, to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.

The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 2 November 2018 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The specific discrimination characteristic is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself does not detail the pleaded allegations.	Struck out	Disability	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claim is struck out. The specific discrimination characteristic is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment text itself does not detail the pleaded allegations.	Struck out	Race	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.