Case 1810881/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Simpson v Norvap Limited (in Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1810881/2018
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buckley JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claim by Mr M Simpson against Norvap Limited (in Administration) was struck out. The Tribunal described the case as a strike out judgment under rule 37.
The reason given was procedural: by letter dated 16 September 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to request a hearing or to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out, because he had not complied with the Tribunal’s request made by letter dated 22 August 2019. The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim because it was not being actively pursued. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute, and no remedy award, are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s); it states only that the claim was struck out because it was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.