Case 1811024/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Kahn Respondent 1: Respondent 2: Respondent 3: Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd Andrea Lyons Karlyn Ward v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811024/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Z Kahn Respondent 1: Respondent 2: Respondent 3: Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd Andrea Lyons Karlyn Ward
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short procedural judgment dated 25 March 2019. The tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed upon withdrawal. It also recorded that the claimant’s claims against the first respondent were unaffected by the judgment.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, legal test, or remedy. It is limited to the withdrawal-based dismissal of the claims against respondents 2 and 3 and therefore contains no award figures or other merits-based determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant’s claims against the second and third respondents stand dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim types in this short order. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.