Case 1811039/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Bailey v James Mark Sanderson Mundy's Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811039/2018
- Decision date
- 19 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Bailey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment at Leeds before Employment Judge Keevash on 18 February 2019 in case numbers 1811039/2018 and 1800044/2019. The only substantive order recorded in this judgment was on the respondent's complaint/counterclaim that Mrs J Bailey had breached her contract of employment by disposing of the respondent's vehicle.
That complaint was dismissed on withdrawal by the respondent. The judgment also records that the remainder of the respondent's counterclaim was to be determined by an Employment Judge at the hearing listed for 3 and 4 June 2019. No remedy or monetary award was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The respondent's complaint that the claimant had breached her contract of employment by disposing of the respondent's vehicle was dismissed on withdrawal by the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.