Case 1811180/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Johnston, of Counsel v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811180/2018
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Members
- Venue
- Sheffield
- Panel members
- Ms M J Cairns, Mr D W Fields
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Johnston, of Counsel
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Sheffield on 25 to 30 October 2019 before Employment Judge Brain sitting with members Ms M J Cairns and Mr D W Fields. The written judgment records that the claimant, through Counsel, withdrew his claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment text does not specify the substantive claim type, but the GOV.UK listing for this decision categorises the case as Public Interest Disclosure. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, through Counsel, withdrew his claims and that they stood dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not specify the substantive claim type, but the GOV.UK listing for this decision categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, through Counsel, withdrew his claims and that they stood dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.