Case 1811253/2018 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Mr. G. Grime, Solicitor Interpreter : Mrs. Y. Brawn — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811253/2018
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon Appearance
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy notice dated 26 April 2019 the parties were listed for a further preliminary hearing to determine timeliness issues, any extension of time, the issues for the final hearing, and any preparatory orders. The hearing took place at Leeds on 14 June 2019 before Employment Judge Wedderspoon. The claimant did not attend and was not represented; the respondent was represented by Mr G. Grime, solicitor, and an interpreter was present.
At 10.10 a.m. there had been no contact from the claimant or her representative explaining the absence. The tribunal clerk attempted to contact the claimant’s representative by telephone and left a voicemail message, but by 10.25 a.m. there was still no attendance and no contact with the tribunal. The tribunal accepted the respondent’s application and dismissed the claims on the basis that the claimant had failed to pursue them by failing to attend the hearing. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.