Case 1811350/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Lawan v The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811350/2018
- Decision date
- 11 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Date
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Lawan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 7 March 2019, Employment Judge D N Jones considered the respondent's application to strike out Mrs M Lawan's race discrimination complaint on the basis that the claimant's or her representatives' conduct had been unreasonable and that a fair trial was no longer possible. The tribunal dismissed that application.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No written merits findings or monetary award are set out in this decision, and the underlying race discrimination complaint is not otherwise determined in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the respondent's application to strike out the race discrimination complaint on the grounds that the conduct of the proceedings by the claimant or her representatives had been unreasonable and a fair trial was no longer possible. The written record says reasons were given orally; no merits determination is recorded in this document. | Other | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.