Case 1811543/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S McCabe v Gardman Ltd (in administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811543/2018
- Decision date
- 29 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S McCabe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal in case 1811543/2018, Mr S McCabe v Gardman Ltd (in administration), issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. The judgment states that by letter dated 26 July 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying wage claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.