Case 1811613/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v Mr A Famutimi, Consultant — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811613/2018
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal substituted Northern Freight Company Limited for LJS Transport Settle Limited as the respondent to the claim and dismissed LJS Transport Settle Limited from the proceedings on the basis that it had no legal interest in the claim.
The respondent paid the claimant £3,228.66 in settlement of the part of the claim listed in the schedule, and undertook to provide a wage slip for the holiday pay together with confirmation and evidence that tax and National Insurance had been accounted for to HM Revenue & Customs. The judgment recorded that, if those steps were taken by 13 September 2019, all of the claimant's claims would stand dismissed upon withdrawal by him unless he applied to restore the case by 23 September 2019. The schedule listed £300.00 for unpaid employers' pension contributions, £1,412.31 for net wages due for October and November 2018, and £1,516.35 for net holiday pay due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a settlement and consent disposal rather than a merits finding. The schedule itemised £300.00 for agreed compensation for unpaid employers' pension contributions, £1,412.31 for net wages due for October and November 2018, and £1,516.35 for net holiday pay due. | Settled | — | £3,229 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,229
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.