Case 1811655/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Gajewski v Associated Waste Management Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1811655/2018
- Decision date
- 15 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Gajewski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Keevash at Leeds on 15 August 2019 in the case of Mr P Gajewski v Associated Waste Management Ltd. The respondent applied for an order striking out the claim, and that application was refused. The tribunal also recorded that deposit orders accompanied the judgment.
The respondent's application for costs was withdrawn, so no costs order was made. The judgment did not decide the substantive employment claim itself; it dealt only with the preliminary applications before the tribunal.
The matter was listed to be heard by an Employment Judge sitting alone at Leeds Employment Tribunals on 31 October and 1 November 2019, and the tribunal noted that a Polish interpreter would be required.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal refused the respondent's application to strike out the claim, but did not determine the underlying claim on its merits in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.