Case 2101434/2007 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Mee Mr D Williams Ms S Power Mrs N Davies Mrs C Gibson v Knowsley MBC — 2023
- Case reference
- 2101434/2007
- Decision date
- 21 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Mee Mr D Williams Ms S Power Mrs N Davies Mrs C Gibson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether it had jurisdiction to hear the equal pay claims of Mr D Williams, Ms S Power, Mrs N Davies and Mrs C Gibson. It found that each claim had been presented more than six months after the claimant’s employment with Knowsley MBC had ended, so each claim was outside the qualifying period for a standard equal pay case under sections 129 and 130 of the Equality Act 2010.
The judgment records the relevant dates it accepted: Mrs Davies’ employment ended on 28 July 2010 and her claim was presented on 13 September 2011; Mrs Gibson’s employment ended on 26 March 2010 and her claim was presented on 29 November 2010; Mr Williams’ employment ended at the latest in January 2012 and his claim was presented on 10 September 2012; and Ms Power’s employment ended on 5 September 2008 and her claim was presented on 25 January 2013. None of the claimants disputed the employment end dates after disclosure and case management steps.
Applying rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the tribunal held that none of the claimants had any reasonable prospect of establishing jurisdiction. It said the Equality Act 2010 does not allow the tribunal to extend the qualifying period, and that the claims would remain time-barred even if the lateness had been caused entirely by a trade union rather than by the claimants themselves.
Each claimant was given the opportunity to make written representations and to request a hearing on strike out. No claimant requested a hearing; Mr Williams made no written representations; the representations filed for Ms Power, Mrs Gibson and Mrs Davies did not identify facts which, if proved, would give the tribunal jurisdiction. The claims were therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Struck out because the tribunal held the claim was presented after the 6-month qualifying period had expired and it had no power to extend time under the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | — | — |
| Equal pay | Struck out because the tribunal held the claim was presented after the 6-month qualifying period had expired and it had no power to extend time under the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | — | — |
| Equal pay | Struck out because the tribunal held the claim was presented after the 6-month qualifying period had expired and it had no power to extend time under the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | — | — |
| Equal pay | Struck out because the tribunal held the claim was presented after the 6-month qualifying period had expired and it had no power to extend time under the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 129 Equality Act 2010
- section 130 Equality Act 2010
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.