Case 2101963/2008 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Bradshaw & others (see attached schedule) v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council & others (see attached schedule) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2101963/2008
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Bradshaw & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 29 August 2023, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out because they had not been actively pursued. The tribunal recorded that the claimants failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and also failed to request a hearing.
Employment Judge Horne therefore struck out the claims. The judgment is dated 26 September 2023 and was sent to the parties on 5 October 2023. The attached schedule lists the linked case numbers and claimants, together with St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council and, in some cases, named governing bodies as respondents. No merits findings or monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The reasons do not restate the substantive cause of action, but the gov.uk listing and case context identify the proceedings as Equal Pay Act claims. The tribunal struck out the claims for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.