Case 2102818/2009 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bryant v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 2102818/2009
- Decision date
- 26 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bryant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 24 April 2023, Employment Judge Horne held that Mr C Bryant's case against St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council was a stable employment case within section 2ZA of the Equal Pay Act 1970. The tribunal found that the stable employment relationship had not ended by the time the claim was presented, so the claim was brought before the qualifying date and the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider it.
The tribunal further held that, even if the case were treated as a standard case rather than a stable employment case, it would still have jurisdiction. It found that the change on 1 September 2008 from Clerical Assistant to Overpayments Officer, together with the associated changes to terms and conditions, did not amount to termination of the original contract followed by re-engagement under a different contract.
On that alternative basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim was presented before the last day on which Mr Bryant was employed in the employment, and therefore before the qualifying date. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Preliminary hearing on jurisdiction only. The tribunal held that Mr Bryant's case was a stable employment case within section 2ZA of the Equal Pay Act 1970 and that the stable employment relationship had not ended before the claim was presented. In the alternative, the tribunal said it would still have jurisdiction on the basis that the 1 September 2008 change in role title and terms did not amount to termination and re-engagement under a different contract, so the claim was presented before the qualifying date. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 2ZA of the Equal Pay Act 1970
- stable employment case
- termination of contract followed by re-engagement
- qualifying date
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.