Case 2200006/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Franka (lay representative) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200006/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emery
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr R Franka (lay representative) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant, Ms M Begum, brought claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages against the Ministry of Justice. Employment Judge Emery heard the case at London Central by video on 25 and 26 January 2023, with Mr R Franka appearing for the claimant and Ms L Robinson for the respondent.
The written record states only the tribunal's final disposal: all claims failed and were dismissed. No separate remedy was awarded, and the extract does not set out any split compensation or other monetary findings. The judgment was sent to the parties on 2 February 2023, and the record notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time after the oral judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.