Case 2200010/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M G Baiden v DOC Cleaning Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2200010/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smailes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M G Baiden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment, heard remotely at London Central on 24 and 25 June 2021 before Employment Judge Smailes sitting alone, does not decide the merits of the pleaded claims. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Ms M G Baiden, required the assistance of an interpreter to give evidence.
Because the tribunal had not been told in advance and an interpreter could not be arranged at short notice, the hearing could not continue to completion. The tribunal therefore adjourned the case part heard and listed it to resume by CVP on Thursday 15 July 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
The reasons note that the tribunal would arrange for a Twi interpreter to attend the resumed hearing. No liability findings or remedy findings were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment does not determine any substantive claim. It adjourns the case part heard to 15 July 2021 because an interpreter was required for the claimant's evidence and could not be arranged at short notice. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.