Case 2200010/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Hussain, Counsel For the First v N/a – content of ET3 and letters considered For the Second Respondent: n/a - content of ET3 and letter considered — 2021
- Case reference
- 2200010/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms S Went, Mr R Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Hussain, Counsel For the First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claim of failure to consult under section 188(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, brought pursuant to section 189, succeeded against the first respondent, Lenlyn UK Limited (in administration). The judgment records this as a protective award claim.
The tribunal ordered the first respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period of 10 weeks, from 5 October 2021 to 13 December 2021. The extracted judgment does not state a monetary figure for the award, so the amount cannot be extracted from the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim for failure to consult within the meaning of section 188(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, brought pursuant to section 189. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.188(2) TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.