Case 2200019/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ali v The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs — 2021
- Case reference
- 2200019/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Walker Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ali
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge N Walker at London Central by CVP on 8 July 2021. The judgment records that the Claimant, Mr M Ali, brought claims against The Commissioners of Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, with the tribunal noting them in the listed categories of race discrimination and religion or belief discrimination.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of any substantive allegation. It found that the claims had been presented outside the statutory time limits and that it was not just and equitable for them to proceed. On that basis, the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claims and dismissed them in full.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not identify the specific factual allegations, but records that the Claimant's claims were presented outside the statutory time limits and were dismissed because it was not just and equitable for them to proceed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment does not identify the specific factual allegations, but records that the Claimant's claims were presented outside the statutory time limits and were dismissed because it was not just and equitable for them to proceed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.