Case 2200030/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D. Russell v AIM CUBE Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200030/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D. Russell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent, AIM CUBE Ltd, failed to present an ET3 Grounds of Resistance. Regional Employment Judge Wade decided the claim could be determined without a hearing on the basis of the ET1 and issued judgment on 16 March 2022. The listed hearing for 17 March 2022 had already been vacated.
The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant, Miss D. Russell, wages owed to her. It therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay Miss D. Russell £4,594.40, made up of seven unpaid sums dated between 2 July 2021 and 21 December 2021: £750, £922.20, £350, £922.20, £900, £300 and £450. The tribunal also ordered the respondent to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due on the amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,594
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,594
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.