Case 2200031/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Choudhury v Gatehouse Bank plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200031/2020
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Choudhury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Norris Date recorded on 1 May 2020 that Mr J Choudhury's complaints of failure to pay holiday pay, arrears of pay and 'other payments' were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of those withdrawn complaints.
The same judgment records that the remaining complaints in the claim, namely unfair dismissal and breach of contract/unlawful deductions from wages, were to proceed to a hearing. No remedy figures, legal tests or lay members are set out in this one-page decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the complaint of failure to pay holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the complaint of arrears of pay was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records that the complaint described as 'other payments' was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.