Case 2200036/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Garrett v Interserve Facilities Management Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200036/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Garrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P Garrett did not appear and was not represented at the hearing on 9 August 2019 at London Central. Miss S Tharoo appeared for the respondent, Interserve Facilities Management Ltd. The tribunal recorded that, on the respondent's application, all claims were struck out and the proceedings were accordingly dismissed.
The tribunal also ordered the claimant to pay a contribution toward the respondent's costs in the sum of £780, stated to represent £650 plus VAT. The judgment does not give further reasons for the strike-out or allocate any merits-based remedy between individual claims.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £780
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.