Case 2200042/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Allen v Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists and 6 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200042/2023
- Decision date
- 28 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Joffe Appearances
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
8 namedClaimant
Mrs D Allen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard this matter at London Central on 28 September 2023 before Employment Judge Joffe. It gave oral reasons at the hearing and noted that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. No monetary award was made.
The claimant’s disability discrimination claims were also dismissed. The Tribunal found that she did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of her employment by the first respondent. The judgment does not record any remedy findings because no claim succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim, so it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The Tribunal found that the claimant did not have a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at the time of her employment by the first respondent, and the disability discrimination claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.