Case 2200117/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v BSS Associates Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200117/2023
- Decision date
- 19 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to file an ET3. Employment Judge Snelson determined the claim on the ET1 without a hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay the claimant wages for July and August 2022, and that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had unlawfully failed to pay wages for July and August 2022 in the sum of £3,530.00. | Upheld | — | £3,530 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay in the sum of £1,765.00. | Upheld | — | £1,765 |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant was not employed long enough to qualify for the right to bring the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,295
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.