Case 2200123/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200123/2023
- Decision date
- 26 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in London Central on 16 May 2023, Employment Judge McGrade, sitting alone, considered the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's failure to make reasonable adjustments claim. The application was argued on the basis that the claim was out of time or had no reasonable prospects of success.
The Tribunal refused the strike out application. The written record does not contain substantive reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the absence of a request. The decision therefore records only that the reasonable adjustments claim was allowed to proceed, without any merits determination of the underlying disability discrimination allegation.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | This was an interlocutory decision on the respondent's application to strike out the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim as out of time or having no reasonable prospects of success. The Tribunal refused the application and did not determine the merits of the underlying claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.