Case 2200176/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. J. Osman Abdelghafour v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200176/2020
- Decision date
- 22 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman JUDGMENT
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr. J. Osman Abdelghafour
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 July 2020, Employment Judge Goodman recorded that the claims brought by Mr. J. Osman Abdelghafour against the Institute and Faculty of Advocates were dismissed on withdrawal. The written record contains no substantive findings on liability or remedy.
The judgment notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties. The extract therefore records the procedural outcome only, rather than any determination of the underlying unfair dismissal or discrimination issues.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal; no substantive findings recorded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal; no substantive findings recorded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal; no substantive findings recorded. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.