Case 2200188/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Green v Arhag Housing Association Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200188/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baty
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Ms T Breslan, Mr M Reuby
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent at London Central before Employment Judge Baty, sitting with Ms T Breslan and Mr M Reuby. The parties had reached terms of settlement before judgment was entered.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant on 3 September 2019. The judgment contains no findings on liability, no analysis of the substantive claims, and no award of compensation.
Because the matter ended by settlement and withdrawal, the judgment does not separate out any remedy by head of claim or apply any merits-based legal test. The only recorded outcome is dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent records that the parties reached terms of settlement and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings were made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Judgment by consent records that the parties reached terms of settlement and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings were made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Judgment by consent records that the parties reached terms of settlement and that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; no merits findings were made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.