Case 2200190/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr G Mansfield, one of Her Majesty’s counsel Ms C Davies, junior counsel — 2021
- Case reference
- 2200190/2021
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Ukwu was employed by ICG FMC Ltd as Assistant Company Secretary on a fixed-term contract from 6 January 2020 to 5 January 2021. His claim form referred to unfair dismissal for whistleblowing, whistleblowing detriment and age discrimination, but the tribunal recorded that only the unfair dismissal claim founded on alleged protected disclosures remained in play because the other claims were rejected for want of an Early Conciliation Certificate. The hearing was for interim relief only, heard remotely, and the tribunal did not take oral evidence.
The tribunal accepted, on a summary basis, that the claimant had a pretty good chance of showing that he made protected disclosures to his former employer Afren in March 2014. It found that the memorandum relied on by the claimant appeared capable of amounting to protected disclosures concerning breach of legal obligation and criminal offence, and that he had a pretty good chance of satisfying the public interest and reasonable-belief requirements.
The application failed because the claimant did not show a pretty good chance that the decision-maker, Mr Lewis, knew about those earlier disclosures or that the non-renewal of the fixed-term contract was because of them. The judge found there was no demonstrated mechanism by which the 2020 HR email links or public-domain material reached Mr Lewis, and treated the claimant’s submission that the respondent must have waited until the end of the contract to avoid suspicion as insufficient at the interim stage. Applying the Taplin line of authority, the tribunal held that the high threshold for interim relief was not met and dismissed the application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Interim relief application under sections 128 and 129 ERA 1996 on an automatic unfair dismissal claim under section 103A; the tribunal noted that the ET1 also referred to whistleblowing detriment and age discrimination, but those claims were rejected for lack of an Early Conciliation Certificate. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- Taplin v C Shippam Ltd
- Dandpat v University of Bath
- Ministry of Justice v Sarfraz
- London City Airport Ltd v Chackro
- His Highness Sheikh Bin Sadr al Qasimi v Robinson
- Chesterton Global Ltd v Nurmohamed
- Ross v Eddie Stobart Ltd
- BP plc v Elstone Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.