Case 2200195/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C. Nolan v IELTS Medical Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200195/2019
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodman Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C. Nolan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice arising from her work as an English tutor for IELTS Medical Ltd. The respondent conceded before the hearing that £1,436 was owed on part of the wages and holiday pay claims, but the remaining dispute turned on whether the claimant had been paid for all the hours she said she worked in November and December 2018.
On unpaid wages, the tribunal accepted that the documentary evidence from both sides was incomplete and that neither side had proper timesheets. It preferred the claimant's account on the remaining disputed 6 hours, noting that her emails at the end of November were straightforward and helpful, while the respondent had little detail about the relevant students and had delayed before admitting underpayment. It awarded £120, being 6 hours at £20 per hour.
The notice claim failed. Applying the statutory distinction between employee and worker, and citing Ready Mixed Concrete and Carmichael v National Power plc, the tribunal found insufficient evidence that the claimant was working under a contract of employment as of 10 December 2018, rather than under hours agreed from time to time. It also said that, even if a contract of employment had existed for more than one month, it was not clear that it had ended other than by mutual agreement, and in any event the evidence did not establish a statutory right to notice. No order was therefore made on that claim.
On holiday pay, the tribunal applied the Working Time Regulations and the statutory approach to holiday accrual and a week's pay under section 224 ERA 1996. It found that the claimant had 33 hours' holiday pay outstanding at £20 per hour, giving £660, and deducted £396 already paid shortly before the hearing. The balance awarded for holiday pay was £264.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal accepted the claimant's account on the remaining disputed 6 hours and awarded 6 hours at £20 per hour. | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found 33 hours' holiday pay due at £20 per hour (£660), less £396 already paid shortly before the hearing, leaving £264 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £264 |
| Breach of contract | The notice claim did not succeed because the tribunal found no sufficient evidence that the claimant was working under a contract of employment as of 10 December 2018; it also said that, if there had been such a contract, the ending may have been by mutual agreement. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £384
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
- section 230 ERA 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete test
- Carmichael v National Power plc
- Working Time Regulations
- section 224 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.