Case 2200200/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Wilder v ShowX Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2200200/2024
- Decision date
- 3 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anthony REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Wilder
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anthony at London Central Employment Tribunal (by CVP) on 21 May 2024 entered judgment for the claimant Mr B Wilder against ShowX Ltd in the agreed sum of £34,692.17. The respondent had not filed a response (ET3); Mr W Knight for the respondent did not contest the claim or the schedule of loss.
The Tribunal found well-founded complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages (£20,613.92 net), breach of contract in relation to employer pension contributions (£2,311.47), accrued annual leave pay on termination (£614.88 net), and unfair dismissal (basic award £1,929 plus compensatory award £9,222.90).
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Accrued annual leave pay on termination (net), pleaded as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £615 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £1,929.00 + compensatory award £9,222.90. | Upheld | — | £11,152 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net sum deducted; respondent did not contest the claim or schedule of loss. | Upheld | — | £20,614 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for breach of contract in respect of employer pension contributions, calculated using respondent's own figures. | Upheld | — | £2,311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £34,692
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,929
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,223
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.