Case 2200227/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Laurynas Arbaciauskas v Marconstruct Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200227/2023
- Decision date
- 29 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Laurynas Arbaciauskas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not file an ET3. Employment Judge Snelson therefore determined the claim on the papers under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, without a hearing, after considering the ET1.
The Tribunal upheld the Claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages in the sum of £1,296.00 and ordered the Respondent to pay that amount to the Claimant. The judgment also records that the Respondent must account to HMRC for any tax and NI due on the sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; Respondent did not file an ET3. The Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in the sum of £1,296.00 and ordered payment of that amount, with any tax and NI to be accounted for to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £1,296 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,296
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.