Case 2200233/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Alexa v Pasta Evangelists Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200233/2022
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Alexa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Ms C Alexa's claim against Pasta Evangelists Limited. By letter dated 18 May 2022, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with Rule 37(1)(c) and (d), failure to comply with the Tribunal's order of 13 April 2022 requiring further particulars of the case, and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Heath struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 21 November 2022 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim as a whole under Rule 37 because the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter of 18 May 2022, had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 13 April 2022 to provide further particulars, and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) and (d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.