Case 2200236/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Mark Greaves of Counsel For v Ms Rebecca Tuck, one of Her Majesty’s Counsel — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200236/2018
- Decision date
- 12 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Paul Stewart
- Panel members
- Mrs Heather Bond, Ms Sylvia Boyce
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Mark Greaves of Counsel For
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe unanimous judgment ordered the respondent, The National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers, to pay the claimant £23,577.87 for the loss of the chance to be elected to the National Executive Committee of the union. The tribunal also awarded interest on that sum at £5.17 per day for 595 days, amounting to £3,074.81.
The judgment recorded a further agreed award of £8,800 for injury to feelings, with agreed interest of £2,288.98. The total award recorded by the tribunal was £37,741.66. The extracted text does not set out the underlying liability reasoning, so the summary is limited to the remedy findings stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal awarded £23,577.87 for the loss of the chance to be elected to the National Executive Committee of the respondent union and £8,800 for injury to feelings, with interest recorded separately. | Upheld | Age | £32,378 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £37,742
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £23,578
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.