Case 2200251/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs M Kasimu v Gareth Rhys Williams, and 4 others — 2022

Case reference: 2200251/2022
Decision date: 5 May 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge B. McKenna Date
Venue: London Central

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

6 named

Claimant

Mrs M Kasimu

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a preliminary hearing heard by video on 4 May 2022 before Employment Judge B. McKenna Date. The second respondent gave an undertaking to the tribunal and the claimant that it would accept liability for the conduct of respondents 1, 3 and 5, accept responsibility for any remedy awarded in respect of that conduct, call them to give evidence at the full merits hearing, and not rely on the defence in section 109(4) Equality Act 2010.

In light of that undertaking, and the second respondent's submission that the claimant had never been employed by respondent 4, the tribunal removed respondents 1, 3, 4 and 5 from the proceedings. All claims were ordered to continue against the second respondent. The claimant's application to amend the claim form was refused. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	At the preliminary hearing, the second respondent undertook to accept liability for the conduct of respondents 1, 3 and 5, accept responsibility for any remedy, call them to give evidence at the full merits hearing, and not rely on section 109(4) Equality Act 2010. In light of that undertaking and the submissions made, the tribunal removed respondents 1, 3, 4 and 5 from the proceedings.	Upheld	—	—
Other	The claimant's application to amend the claim form was refused.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.