Case 2200286/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Werhun-Mozdzen v Portico Ealing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200286/2020
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkin Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Werhun-Mozdzen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under rule 21 and, on the documents supplied by Ms A Werhun-Mozdzen, found that Portico Ealing Ltd had unlawfully failed to pay wages to the claimant. It assessed the claim without a hearing on the evidence provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid salary awarded as 3 weeks' pay, calculated on an average weekly rate of £535.38 from payslips for September, October and November 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,606 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded as 4 weeks' pay, calculated on the same average weekly rate of £535.38 from payslips for September, October and November 2019. | Upheld | — | £2,142 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy pay awarded on the basis of the maximum allowable weekly gross income of £525 and 19 weeks' entitlement under the statutory formula. | Upheld | — | £9,975 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,723
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.