Case 2200309/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Kadam v Yummy Licks Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200309/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Snelson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Kadam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short case management disposal rather than a merits judgment. The Employment Tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr D Kadam.
The judgment does not set out findings of fact, liability reasoning, or any remedy calculation. It also does not identify the substantive claim within the text provided, although the case listing context indicates an unlawful deduction from wages claim.
No award was made and no legal test was applied in the judgment text. The only substantive outcome recorded is that the proceedings ended because the claimant withdrew the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The claim type is inferred from the case listing/context; the judgment text itself does not restate the substantive claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.