Case 2200318/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Aaron Belchamber v Marex Financial — 2023
- Case reference
- 2200318/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Singh Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Aaron Belchamber
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at London Central, sitting by CVP before Employment Judge Singh, heard the matter on 30 and 31 May 2023. The extracted judgment records the claimant as Mr Aaron Belchamber and the respondent as Marex Financial.
The only substantive determination visible in the extracted text is that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was not successful and was dismissed. No reasons, findings of fact, or legal analysis are included in the extracted text provided here.
No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment text, and no separate award is stated. The extraction therefore records the unfair dismissal claim as dismissed and leaves the remedies fields null.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unfair dismissal was not successful and was dismissed. The extracted text also contains a date line reading '31st May 2026', which appears inconsistent with the sent-to-parties date of 23/06/2023, but the outcome itself is clear. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.