Case 2200319/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Augeri v Elephant Family — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200319/2020
- Decision date
- 5 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Augeri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case 2200319/2020, the tribunal recorded that Mr D Augeri's complaints of breach of contract and breach(es) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were dismissed on withdrawal. No merits findings are made in this short judgment on those complaints, and no monetary award is recorded.
The judgment also states that the remaining complaints in the claim were to proceed to a hearing. This document therefore deals only with the withdrawal dismissal of the breach of contract and TUPE complaints, and does not determine the other pleaded claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the Claimant's complaint of breach of contract was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment states that the Claimant's complaint of breach(es) of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.