Case 2200359/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Adams v Sales Point Recruitment Ltd (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200359/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Adams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London Central on 5 January 2022, Employment Judge A M Snelson heard the Claimant in person. The Respondents, Sales Point Recruitment Ltd (in liquidation), presented no response form and played no part in the proceedings. The Tribunal held that the Claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and denial of the right to be accompanied under Employment Relations Act 1999 s11 were all well-founded.
For unfair dismissal, the Tribunal ordered a compensatory award of £44,975.73. That figure was said to comprise £44,675.73 for loss of earnings and £300 for loss of statutory rights. For unauthorised deductions from wages, the Tribunal awarded £8,016.30 and noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable in respect of that award, subject to appropriate deductions being made and accounted for.
For the s11 right-to-be-accompanied claim, the Tribunal ordered compensation of £10,501. The extracted text renders this amount as £1,0501, and the footnote explains that it represented two week's pay and that the cap on a week's pay was overlooked at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The compensatory award was stated as £44,975.73, made up of £44,675.73 for loss of earnings and £300 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £44,976 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment ordered payment of £8,016.30 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages and noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on this award. | Upheld | — | £8,016 |
| Other | The claim was under Employment Relations Act 1999, s11 for denial of the right to be accompanied. The OCR text renders the amount as £1,0501; the accompanying footnote says this was two week's pay and that the cap on a week's pay was overlooked. | Upheld | — | £10,501 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £63,493
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £44,976
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.