Case 2200375/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Courtney Cox v Harrods Ltd. — 2025
- Case reference
- 2200375/2025
- Decision date
- 20 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G. King Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Courtney Cox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs Courtney Cox, brought a complaint against Harrods Limited which was heard at London Central Employment Tribunal on 15 August 2025 before Employment Judge G. King. The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive nature of the complaint, but it records that the claim had been presented out of time.
The Tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend time. On that basis, it found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaint and dismissed the claim. No liability findings on the merits and no remedy award are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text; it states only that the claim was submitted out of time and that it was not just and equitable to extend time, so the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.