Case 2200377/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D v O’Daly MTN-1 Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200377/2020
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 23 April 2020, Employment Judge A M Snelson sat in chambers and determined the case on the papers after no response had been received by or on behalf of the Respondents. The tribunal found that both of the Claimant's complaints were well-founded.
The wrongful dismissal claim succeeded in the sum of £3,075.58, identified in the judgment as 2.5 weeks' net notice pay underpaid. The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,462.50, calculated as (1 x £525 x 4) + (1.5 x £525 x 3). It also awarded a compensatory award of £86,116.10, made up of £22,144.14 for loss to assessment for 18 weeks from 19 December 2019 to 23 April 2020 at £1,230.23 net per week, and £63,971.96 for future loss for 52 weeks at the same weekly rate. The overall unfair dismissal award was £90,578.60.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as 2.5 weeks' net notice pay underpaid. | Upheld | — | £3,076 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award £4,462.50 and compensatory award £86,116.10 were specified separately; overall unfair dismissal award £90,578.60. | Upheld | — | £90,579 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £93,654
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,463
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £86,116
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.