Case 2200397/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Texeira v Corbelo UK Recruiting Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2200397/2021
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Texeira
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by CVP at London Central on 7 May 2021 before Employment Judge A M Snelson, the tribunal heard the claimant in person and Mr M Gardner, Operations Manager, for the respondent. The judgment records a single claim: a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal determined that the complaint was well-founded and ordered Corbelo UK Recruiting Ltd to pay the claimant £240 in respect of the unlawful deduction. No further findings of fact or separate reasoning are set out in the extracted judgment beyond the tribunal's conclusion on that claim.
The tribunal added a note that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the award, and that if the respondent makes appropriate deductions and accounts for them to the proper authorities, payment of the net sum will discharge the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £240. It also noted that income tax and national insurance contributions may be payable on the award. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £240
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.