Case 2200401/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. Claudius Baptiste v Network Rail Infrastructure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2200401/2021
- Decision date
- 7 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. Claudius Baptiste
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant became aware of and read the dismissal letter on 25 October 2020, so that was the effective date of termination for limitation purposes. The primary three-month time limit expired on 24 January 2021, and the claim presented on 1 February 2021 was eight days late.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had been ill while abroad, had undergone operations, returned to the UK on 12 December 2020, quarantined, and remained unwell and in pain into January 2021. It found that for much of the limitation period it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim because of illness, and in the final weeks the delay was substantially caused by a combination of continuing illness and the claimant's expectation that he would be reinstated on appeal.
The tribunal concluded that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented within the primary time limit and that the further eight-day period before presentation was reasonable. It therefore held that it had jurisdiction to consider the unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The preliminary hearing determined only jurisdiction and time limits for the unfair dismissal claim. The merits of the unfair dismissal claim were not decided. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.111(2)(a) ERA 1996
- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.97(1)(b) ERA 1996
- Gisda Cyf v Barratt
- s.207B ERA 1996
- Trevelyans (Birmingham) Ltd v Norton
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum
- John Lewis Partnership v A P Charman
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Wall's Meat Co Ltd v Khan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.