Case 2200405/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr J Turner, Solicitor — 2019
- Case reference
- 2200405/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie
- Venue
- London Central
- Panel members
- Mr L Tyler, Ms EA Flanagan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at London Central on 2-4 December 2019 before Employment Judge Glennie, with Mr L Tyler and Ms EA Flanagan as the lay members. The claimant, Mr C Adenkunle, appeared in person and the respondent, Iqvia Solutions UK Limited, was represented by Mr J Turner, Solicitor.
The tribunal's unanimous judgment was that the complaint of direct discrimination because of race was dismissed. The written record does not set out detailed reasons, but it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The decision notice also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Unanimous judgment dismissing the complaint of direct discrimination because of race. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.